schmied/reid©2011
Chapter/Section 18.1 - 18.4
all rights reserved
Environment Core Part Two Ecology Vocab & Research Vocabulary building instructions
Instructions: For each section list the vocabulary words and make up a CQC sentence that uses each word and, at the same time, defines it. Underline the words being defined. (Glossary definitions will not receive full credit.)
Example: Biosphere
Defining sentence: The biosphere is made up of the atmosphere, the earth's crust, the water, and all the living things within its boundaries.
Research Question Instructions: Complete the following Data Tables, Exercises and Questions on a separate sheet of paper. Quality answers embody the question in the answer in a complete, informative sentence(s). Quality answers will receive the most credit. Use lined paper and ink or word processor.
Chapter/Section 18.1 The living and non living Environment (95 points for this job)
a. Complete Vocabulary building using the Science Words page 482. (3pts. Each =20 pts.)
b. Questions: Answer questions 1- 6 (75 total points!)
1. Use the information in your text to complete the following data table on Abiotic factors and their effect on living things.
Data Table 18.1 Summary of Abiotic Factors and Effects on Living things (30 pt, 3 pts ea)
2. List the three component parts of soil and explain which part makes some soils more fertile than others. (5pts, 3pt ea.)
Abiotic Factors Description Effects on living things 3 Examples of living things found in this abiotic environment. Air
,
,
,
Water
,
,
,
Soil
,
,
,
Light
,
,
None, living things depend upon light for food or energy. Temperature ,
,
None, living things depend upon temperature to help drive life processes 3.What four specific factors do all organisms depend on other organisms to get for them? (5pt, 1ea)
4.List the 7 levels of your internal biological organization from the smallest to largest level. (10pt, 1ea)
5.You are the organism in the center of 7 nested ovals, one inside another.
Use your massive understanding of the levels of Biological Organization to label each level in the proper ring outward from your level. (10pts, 3pt ea)
6.What's the difference between: (15pt, 5pt each)
a. A population and a community?b. A community and an ecosystem?
c. An ecosystem and the Biosphere?
Chapter/Section 18.2 Interactions among Living Organisms (95 points for this job)
a. Complete Vocabulary building using the 10 Science Words on page 488. (3pts. ea 30 pts.)
b. Questions: Answer questions 7 &endash; 19 (65 total points!)
Population Density. When we study populations of organisms we look at key factors like population density. Let's work through a couple examples to figure out the population density in a science laboratory.
Lab One: Mr. Schmied's science lab has 30 students in it, and the room measures 12 meters by 15 meters.
7. What is the population in Mr Schmied's lab? _______Units! (5pt)
8. Tell the total Area in square meters of Mr Schmied's lab? ______. (LxW=Area) (5pt)
9. What is the density of Mr Schmied's lab? (Note: Density = Population / Area) ._____. Units? (5pt)
Lab Two: Ms. Farr's science lab measures 19 meters x 20 metes and has 36 students in it.
10. What is the total Area in square meters of Ms Farr's lab? _______(Show your work & use proper units!) (5pt)
11. Now what is the Population in Ms Farr's lab ? ______. Units? (5pt)
12. What is the density of Ms Farr's lab? (Note: Density = Population / Area ._____. Units? (5pt
13. Which Science Lab has a higher population density? Mr. Schmied's or Ms. Farr's? (5pt)
14. Explain what a limiting factor is and give three examples. (5pt)
15. Tell what carrying capacity is and tell what determines carrying capacity. (5pt)
16. What are the three types of symbiotic relationship? (5pt)
17. What is the difference between Mutualism and Commensalism (5pt)
18. What is the difference between Mutualism and Parasitism (5pt)
19. Explain the difference between a Habitat and a Niche. (5pt)
Chapter/Section 18.3 Matter and Energy (150 points for this job)
a. Complete Vocabulary building using the 5 Science Words on page 496. (3pts. Each = 15 pts.)
b. Questions: Answer questions 14 to 20 (130 total points!)
20. On Earth organisms interact to produce intricate systems that are powered by energy from the sun. In the data table below, write a short description for each link the food chain as given in Figure 18.13 on P496/7 of your book.
Data Table #2 Food chain Information (45 pts - 3pts each)
Name of link Define how it gets energy! Specific Examples First Link . . .Second Link . . .Third Link . . .Fourth Link . . .Final Link . . .21. Explain what a food chain is and tell what the difference is between a food chain and a food web. (10pts)
22. List two differences between a food chain and a matter cycler (5pts)
23. Tell a good reason why the matter cycler tells the story about relationships between living things better then a food chain. (5 pts).
24. Scientists use an energy pyramid model to look at how energy moves through food chains. Look at the energy pyramid on page 498 and use your E&E notes on energy pyramids to help you finish the following questions.
Make a COMPLETE energy pyramid, including Niches, Calories, Names etc, just like in class
· Start out with 20,000,000 calories of grass (25pt)
· Include these creatures/things: The Sun, Cougars, Mice, Grass, Fox, Wolves, Fungi
Use the Energy pyramid YOU MADE in #24 above to help you answer the following questions.
25. Now draw a CQC Matter cycler using the living creatures listed in #24 above. (20 pts)
26. A mountain has three cougars on it. One cougar needs 9,000 calories a day to survive. How many calories do 3 Cougars need to survive each day? (5 pt)
27. Use the energy pyramid in #24 and the data from #26 above to create a new energy pyramid that tells how many calories need to be available at each of the other levels below in order to keep all 3 cougars alive. (10pt) (Hint &endash; Work backward, starting at the Top Carnivore)
Chapter/Section 18.4: Bringing back the Wolves / Ecological changes linked to Wolves
Read the short article in your book on page 502. Next read the attached article on recovery efforts for wolves in the years since. Then answer the questions attached for 18.4. (5pt ea except for question 4 which needs a Data Table with good, clear answers for 20 points.)
By Warren Cornwall Period__
Ten years ago today, the first of eight travel-weary wolves stepped out of its cage and into Yellowstone National Park. Those steps, the first known wolf prints in Yellowstone in decades created ecological and social currents that are changing the landscape in parts of Montana, Idaho and Wyoming. The return of one of the region's top predators, now numbering up to 900, may be altering everything from elk behavior to tree growth to beaver populations. Ranchers manage their livestock differently, and some face wrenching losses. Hunters now pursue wolf-spooked elk.The changes offer a glimpse of what the future may hold for parts of Washington, where it's only a matter of time before wolves take up residence, biologists say. Oregon State University forester Bill Ripple went to Yellowstone National Park in 1997 looking for an answer to the decline in aspen groves there. He emerged with a surprising answer: wolves. A study of growth rings on the trees showed that the youngest dated to the 1920s, around the time when wolves were eradicated from the park. Ripple hypothesized that the disappearance of the predators emboldened elk, which then ate young, tasty trees with impunity.
He and a colleague followed up with research that found similar age patterns in cottonwood trees, and evidence that willows have had a resurgence in recent years. "As soon as we get rid of wolves, plants stop flourishing. Soon after we bring wolves back, plants are flourishing again," Ripple said. If true, it shows how wolves can influence a broad web of plants and animals. Beaver rely on willows for food and songbirds live in aspens and willows, so their populations might rebound. Animals that thrive around beaver dams could get a boost. Already, a part of the park now hosts nine beaver colonies where there was one when the wolves first arrived, said Douglas Smith, the lead wolf researcher at Yellowstone National Park.
The wolf's arrival also has coincided with a 50 percent drop in coyote populations, Smith said. That could help red foxes, which are killed by coyotes. It also could increase populations of rodents eaten by coyotes, a potential boon for hawks that prey on mice. "We've grown accustomed to what the world looks like without top-level carnivores. Here you've got a place where they're all present, and it looks real different," he said.
Not all scientists are persuaded of the wolf's transformative effect. Duncan Patten, a Montana State University ecologist, said it's hard to separate the wolves from other factors, such as drought and mild winters in recent years. Willows, for example, may be rebounding because there hasn't been a harsh winter forcing elk to dine on the woody brush, he said. "There are a lot of things going on," Patten said. "The unfortunate thing is too many people do what I call single-factor ecology and point at the wolves as the only factor."
The fate of elk is also in dispute. The park's biggest herd has fallen from 20,000 to 10,000 since the wolf's return. Smith said wolves are just one factor, along with hunting, grizzly bears and drought. But the decline has been controversial, as hunters confront a dwindling herd and state officials point to the wolves. Kurt Alt, a Montana state wildlife manager, said he thinks the wolves are playing a critical role. Still, elk aren't declining in other parts of Montana where wolves aren't as concentrated, Alt said.
2007 update Margaret Soulen Hinson doesn't doubt that wolves were responsible for the loss of as many as 300 sheep on her central Idaho ranch last summer. She, her family and shepherds tried everything from using guard dogs to sleeping overnight on the ground with her sheep to ward off the predators. Eventually, government agents resorted to killing 12 wolves to try to stop the carnage. "I'll be honest, I think we can live with some wolves. But certainly this past summer was too much in loss and very difficult for everyone. We simply couldn't figure out a way to keep the wolves out of the sheep," she said.
The wolves' quick spread has been a surprise to some. In 1995, the only known packs in the western United States lived in the remote northwestern corner of Montana. The animals were listed under the Endangered Species Act. That year, in a move that drew furious opposition from ranchers and state officials in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming, the federal government began releasing Canadian wolves in Yellowstone and central Idaho, eventually introducing 66 animals.
"When we put those wolves in, we thought it would take a few years before we had reproduction, and they proved us wrong because we had pups that first year," said Joe Fontaine, assistant recovery coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which has overseen wolf reintroduction. Today, between 850 and 900 roam parts of those three states, Fontaine said. The wolf soon could be dropped from the Endangered Species list
Gray wolves in the Northern Rockies will be removed from the endangered species list, following a 13 year restoration effort that helped the animal's population soar, federal officials said. An estimated 1,500 wolves now roam Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. That represents a dramatic turnaround for a predator that was largely exterminated in the U.S. outside of Alaska in the early 20th century.
UPDATE 2008: Gray Wolves: Off Endangered Species List
Matthew Brown, Associated Press Feb. 22, 2008
"Gray wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains are thriving and no longer require the protection of the Endangered Species Act," said Interior Deputy Secretary Lynn Scarlett. "The wolf's recovery in the Northern Rocky Mountains is a conservation success story."
The restoration effort, however, has been unpopular with ranchers and many others in the three states since it began in the mid 1990s, and today some state leaders want the population thinned significantly. The states are planning to allow hunters to target the animals as soon as this fall. That angers environmental groups, which plan to sue over the delisting and say it's too soon to remove federal protection.
"The enduring hostility to wolves still exists," said Earthjustice attorney Doug Honnold, who is preparing the lawsuit. "We're going to have hundreds of wolves killed under state management. It's a sad day for our wolves."
Plans submitted by Idaho, Montana and Wyoming indicate the states will likely maintain between 900 and 1,250 wolves for the foreseeable future, federal officials said. Wolves have increasingly preyed on livestock as they expanded into new territories. At the same time, ranchers and wildlife agents have made more wolf kills, which are allowed under the Endangered Species Act in response to livestock conflicts.
Since the late 1980s, 724 wolves have been killed legally. Roughly the same number are estimated to have been killed illegally by poachers. Despite that, the overall wolf population has continued to grow at the rate of 24 percent a year.
"We've been managing wolves pretty aggressively for livestock problems, but there are still a ton of wolves over a big area," said Ed Bangs, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologist who led the wolf recovery effort. The wolf was nearly wiped out in the West through a government eradication program in the 1930s that included widespread poisoning of wolves. In the late 1980s the wolf had just 200 square miles of territory around Glacier National Park, in Montana near the Canadian border.
Wolves were listed as endangered in 1974, and the government has spent more than $27 million on recovery efforts in the Northern Rockies.
Since an initial 66 wolves (eight at first) were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho in the mid 1990s, their population has grown rapidly. The wolf's territory now covers an estimated 113,000 square miles, Bangs said. The wolf will be formally removed from the endangered species list 30 days after the federal government's decision is published in the Federal Register, which is expected next week. (editors note. Grey wolves were delisted shortly after this article was written.)
Meanwhile, wildlife agencies in the three states have already begun crafting rules for wolf hunts. Officials say the hunts will be similar to those for other big game species such as mountain lions and black bears. In Montana, state wildlife commissioners this week adopted regulations for a hunt to begin this fall. Idaho also is eyeing a fall hunt, and Wyoming plans to complete its plans in the next few months.
Limits on how many wolves could be killed in each state have not been set. Public hunting could significantly decrease the size of the wolf's range. It could also reduce the chance of wolves spreading to neighboring states such as Utah, Colorado, Oregon and Washington.
Environmental groups critical of such hunts say the government should be moving in the opposite direction, restoring wolves to areas where they are not now found. The only other areas of the lower 48 states where gray wolves live are the western Great Lakes and the Southwest. A population of about 4,000 wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin was dropped from the endangered list last year, while a reintroduced population of dozens of animals in Arizona and New Mexico has struggled to expand.
In a petition filed Wednesday with the Department of Interior, Defenders of Wildlife and the Natural Resource Defense Council argued new wolf populations should be established in Maine, New York, Oregon, Colorado, Utah, Washington and possibly New Hampshire, Texas and portions of the mid-Atlantic.
Federal officials said Thursday there were no immediate plans to reintroduce wolves into other states or regions. However, an independent wolf biologist said he would be "shocked" if the animal again ends up on the endangered list.
"The last thing any of the states want is for wolves to be re-listed by the federal government," said Daniel Pletscher, director of the University of Montana's wildlife biology program. He added that tolerance of wolves has grown immensely since the species was nearly wiped out.
2011 Update: Wolf population dips in Northern Rockies March 11, 2011 By MATTHEW BROWN
Wildlife officials say the Northern Rockies gray wolf population has decreased for the first time since the animal was reintroduced to the region 15 years ago. A census of the endangered species released Friday by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service showed the number of wolves fell by about 5 percent in 2010, to 1,651 animals.
Fewer wolves in Idaho accounted for the entire drop, as wolf numbers were up slightly in Montana, Wyoming, Oregon and Washington.
The decline is set against a backdrop of rising political pressure to allow more hunting of the predators, which have aggravated ranchers and sportsmen with attacks on livestock and big game herds. The number of attacks on cattle was virtually unchanged. Sheep losses dropped sharply from 721 in 2009 to 245 last year.
Please answer the following questions on a separate sheet of paper in Complete, Quality and Correct sentences. 75 points total. 1. Tell how much the population of wolves has grown in the past 10 years as a percentage change. (ex 100(# today / # at start).
2. Explain what question Professor Bill Ripple, an OSU forester, went to Yellowstone to answer, and tell what he hypothesized in his study.
3.Later, Professor Ripple followed up his study with more research, this time on Cottonwood and Willow trees. Describe what Professor Ripple concluded from his studies.
4. Returning wolves to Yellowstone has far reaching effects on animal populations in the park. Use the data table to show at least four animals whose populations are predicted to gain or lose by this change to the park's wildlife.
Name of Animal Ecological Niche Gain /Lose Tell: Why Gain? or Why Lose?
5. Explain how the Professor's opinion from MSU, Duncan Patten, differs from Bill Ripple's conclusion about the wolves.
From 2005
6. Explain why ranchers and state officials from Idaho, Montana and Wyoming became so furious with the federal government.
From 2008 update
7. Now that the wolves are delisted what are the states preparing to do that angers the environmental groups?
8. How many wolves were killed legally since the late 1980's,
9. How many wolves were killed illegally in the same period of time And tell who illegally killed these wolves??
10.Tell how much money the Federal Government spent on the Northern Rocky Wolf recovery program?
11. How were the reintroduced wolf populations doing in The Midwest And the Southwest?
From the 2011 update.
12. Tell the population status of wolves in 2010 And what state accounted for this decline.
EE2 Core Ecology Index
Project Page Home © 2011 John Schmied & Mike Reid all rights reserved